So on the 8th January I had an idea for a new mobile app. A rather good idea. So as you do, I tweeted it...
My challenge to myself was to get the app designed, developed and into the Android and iOS app stores in 2 months. So by March 8th, which coincidentally is the day before my birthday.
Anyway, I thought I would post a quick update. The concept for the app is done, the internal build has started and we even have a logo...
I won't go into detail on what the app will do yet, all I'll say is that it's music related and ties into Playlists.net nicely. It's designed to be fun, an aid to music discovery and something you will use every day. More soon!
Ministry of Sound are suing Spotify for copyright infringement. You can read the details here but the long and short of it is that some Spotify users are creating playlists using the same tracklisting and titles as existing MoS albums. MoS are objecting to this and have asked Spotify to remove the playlists but Spotify insist they aren't responsible for their users content and to date haven't taken them down.
As the founder of the biggest Spotify playlist resource online, Playlists.net I'll be following this case with interest. In the past we've been contacted by MoS to take down exactly these kind of playlists described in the law suit. In fact as well as duplicating the tracks from a compilation album into a playlist we've had users go one step further and use the official album artwork as playlist artwork - something you can't do within Spotify, but you can on Playlists.net. As we're only a small company with no budget for legal expenses we've always complied with MoS and removed any playlists they ask us to. Quite simply we don't have the money or the will to fight them in court.
Many people including myself have compared Now That's What I Call Music with MoS. Both have a booming business curating compilation albums, the difference is that Now Music is a joint venture between 2 major record labels, Universal and Sony. Who are not only shareholders in Spotify but also own the rights to the majority of tracks on Now Music albums, so they earn money from streams of Now Music albums. Now Music have even gone so far as to compile playlists of all of their albums and have been publishing them on our site since 2011. They also have a popular Spotify app, it's fair to say they have embraced the streaming ecosystem.
On the other hand, MoS licence most of the tracks for their compilation albums from other labels. So if they were to publish these compilations on Spotify then MoS wouldn't benefit from the streams financially.
The whole idea that a playlist can be subject to copyright laws is fascinating to me. For example, one of our most popular playlists is the Radio 1 Weekly Playlist that has over 157,000 followers on Spotify. Each week the user simply looks up the Radio 1 playlist, which is widely available online and pops the tracks into the playlist. We also have similar playlists for pretty much all BBC radio stations as well as specific playlists from popular shows like Jo Wiley and Zane Lowe. Are these subject to copyright? I've actually spoken to a legal counsel about the BBC playlists and the general opinion is that the BBC wouldn't take any legal action as it's "just not what they do."
But what about music from TV shows or movies? Our soundtracks section is immensely popular and playlists like this one from HBO's Girls in particular is a crowd pleaser. How about the music from video games? We know that game studios like Rockstar Games invest a ton of money in licensing music and even original content for their games such as the forthcoming GTA V which as you can guessed already has a playlist. Then there's Rolling Stone who often publish "top 100" lists in their magazine, these are ripe for playlisting and we often receive multiple playlists of the same lists. Can Rolling Stone serve us a takedown notice?
As well as user generated content we also curate and publish our own playlists on the site, some of which you can see scattered amongst this article. It takes a lot of time and thought to put together something like 100 Amazing Covers and The World's Most Perfect Pop Songs, would I be annoyed if somebody copied them? Yes. Would I sue? No. The reason I wouldn't sue is because although anybody can replicate a playlist we have the brand, the momentum and the audience. I wouldn't really care if a kid in a bedroom somewhere in the world decided to copy and publish my playlist.
Which is exactly what Ministry of Sound should be thinking.
Instead of taking Spotify to court and objecting about users creating MoS playlists if I were them I'd partner with Spotify, build a MoS app, replicate every MoS album as a playlist and dominate curated playlists as well as they dominate compilation albums. Sure they wouldn't receive cash on streams of songs which they licence but they will on their own artists. It's not as if their artists aren't popular either with Example, Wretch 32 and DJ Fresh among the biggest. I'm sure they could earn sizeable revenue from their own artist streams.
Aside from the revenue generated from streams, MoS could also earn from ticket and merchandise sales from a Spotify app, in the same way that the Songkick and Bluenote apps link out to ticket/merchandise sales. There are also opportunities to work with Spotify and brands to create branded environments within Spotify apps which could also pay well. It really does help to think about other revenue opportunities and not just cash generated from streams.
Not only that but by launching a branded MoS app and having a presence in Spotify means that MoS can get their brand out to millions of music fans around the world. For the relatively small cost of building an app (and we can help with that btw) and of course some investment in time they could reach a whole new audience at a much cheaper cost than traditional marketing via TV, print or radio.
That's what I would do if I were MoS. The whole idea of MoS suing Spotify because it's users are going to the effort of curating playlists based on their albums reminds of the days when the record labels would try to sue people who illegally downloaded music MP3's for ridiculous amounts of money. The very fact that users want to have MoS content on Spotify but have to create their own, because it's not there is a huge compliment. MoS need to embrace this and work with their audience, not against them. This could quite easily turn into a huge PR disaster for MoS if they don't reverse this crazy decision soon.
One last thought...
If you don't embrace new technologies and markets such as streaming then there will always be somebody else that will. I'm not saying that playlisting and curation is easy but neither is it brain surgery. We have some excellent compilation series such as the Strictly BASS series that now consists of 51 playlists and a very loyal following. Then there's the excellent Soundtrack To... playlist series that even has record labels contacting us asking if we can put them in touch with the original curator so they can pitch their priority tracks to him for inclusion in the next playlist.
What I'm listening to right now: Wretch 32 - Doing OK (well I would love to but seeing as Wretch 32 is signed to MoS and not available on Spotify I'll just make do with this lovely tribute version instead.
I noticed this for the first time on Facebook today:
When I hover over the question mark it says "Suggestions based on Pages you like and music you listen to".
What's more, these are all Spotify links. I don't know if this is because I have Spotify installed and linked to my Facebook account or if they are all Spotify by default. Either way, it's great exposure for Spotify and is bound to drive up streams and engagement.
However, when I click on any of the album artwork, I see this popup:
So although Spotify is the default option there is the choice of playing in Deezer too. Interesting.
Over 4 years ago in 2008, I first launchedContentNow.co.uk to help websites with their content creation. The problem I experienced as an owner of various websites was that I didn't have the time or expertise to write my own content and I couldn't find reliable content writers at a good price to supply content for me. So ContentNow was born.
In the 4 years since we launched we've grown steadily and now have hundreds of clients from blue chips right through to bedroom affiliates. We pride ourselves on being able to produce high quality content on all sorts of niches and verticals. We have several hundred writers on our team now and deliver tens of thousands of pieces of content per month.
The most recent Google updates have shown that quality content is more important now than ever and is something we have always believed in. We've even helped some of our clients to get featured in Google News, bringing them a whole new traffic source and authority.
Anyway, since we have been so busy meeting the needs of our clients we've not had the time to give our own website an update, so it's taken so time but it's finally live. As well as a new look we've also lowered the prices on one of our most popular products, our Daily News service.
If you're thinking of getting some content produced then please give us a try, here's 10 reasons why you should:
1. All of our content is written here in the UK by writers who speak English as their primary language. Nothing is outsourced offshore. We also have a significant American team for USA and international clients.
2. You pay nothing upfront. Unlike our competitors we bill you at the beginning of every month for content produced the previous month.
3. If you don't like anything we write we'll rewrite it for you free of charge, no questions asked.
4. All content is original. Every piece of content written for us is checked for plagiarism using software and then proof read by a human for accuracy and grammar.
5. We can deliver both standard content such as product reviews, category descriptions or anything that you supply us a brief for...
6. We can also produce Daily News, so for example you may run a mobile phone website and require 2 pieces of news daily relevant to your site. No problem.
7. Our Daily News prices have just been reduced. Check them out here.
8. Want us to upload the content we write to your website via your CMS? No problem, we can do that too.
9. Over 20 years combined experience. Myself and my business partner Simon Snelling have over 20 years experience in content creation and SEO. We know what website owners want and how to meet their needs.
10. We can give you a free trial. If you want a 500 word sample piece from us then just email me kieron.donoghue at contentnow.co.uk and I'll sort you out.
In my 12 years or so of Internet Marketing the most common question I get asked is how do I make money on my blog/site? Forget AdSense and all the other ad serving services, they'll only make you pennies, here's what to do instead...
Follow Gary Vaynerchuck's brilliant advice and hustle. It really is easy but I'll be surprised if anyone I know actually does it.