<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No need for the negativity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.here.org.uk/2010/01/no-need-for-the-negativity.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.here.org.uk/2010/01/no-need-for-the-negativity.html</link>
	<description>Welcome to Kieron&#039;s blog - the life and times of an Internet Marketeer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 20:03:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Barker</title>
		<link>http://www.here.org.uk/2010/01/no-need-for-the-negativity.html/comment-page-1#comment-14179</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Barker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.here.org.uk/?p=1826#comment-14179</guid>
		<description>I hadn&#039;t seen this story on TechCrunch, but then again I actively try not to visit it as I agree with many of you guys, I have a fairly low opinion of them that starts from the top downwards.

I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if there was involvement in other californian-based startups, who&#039;s to say what&#039;s going on behind the scenes, you just got to look at the recent MacBook Air that got requested by a writer.

Or perhaps there is simply an annoyance that the American market isn&#039;t first in getting the latest cool product/service for once?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t seen this story on TechCrunch, but then again I actively try not to visit it as I agree with many of you guys, I have a fairly low opinion of them that starts from the top downwards.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if there was involvement in other californian-based startups, who&#8217;s to say what&#8217;s going on behind the scenes, you just got to look at the recent MacBook Air that got requested by a writer.</p>
<p>Or perhaps there is simply an annoyance that the American market isn&#8217;t first in getting the latest cool product/service for once?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Copeland</title>
		<link>http://www.here.org.uk/2010/01/no-need-for-the-negativity.html/comment-page-1#comment-14174</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Copeland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.here.org.uk/?p=1826#comment-14174</guid>
		<description>IMO the article is news worthy...simply because most of the other news around has about as much factual content :)

On the Spotify front, I&#039;ve only recently upgraded my account to premium but its the best investment I&#039;ve made in ages, especially with the iPhone app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO the article is news worthy&#8230;simply because most of the other news around has about as much factual content <img src='http://www.here.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>On the Spotify front, I&#8217;ve only recently upgraded my account to premium but its the best investment I&#8217;ve made in ages, especially with the iPhone app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Octy</title>
		<link>http://www.here.org.uk/2010/01/no-need-for-the-negativity.html/comment-page-1#comment-14151</link>
		<dc:creator>Octy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.here.org.uk/?p=1826#comment-14151</guid>
		<description>Last.fm reckons TechCrunch are full of shit too.

http://blog.last.fm/2009/02/23/techcrunch-are-full-of-shit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last.fm reckons TechCrunch are full of shit too.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.last.fm/2009/02/23/techcrunch-are-full-of-shit" rel="nofollow">http://blog.last.fm/2009/02/23/techcrunch-are-full-of-shit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Septy</title>
		<link>http://www.here.org.uk/2010/01/no-need-for-the-negativity.html/comment-page-1#comment-14135</link>
		<dc:creator>Septy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.here.org.uk/?p=1826#comment-14135</guid>
		<description>I guess nobody likes her very much. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess nobody likes her very much. <img src='http://www.here.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.here.org.uk/2010/01/no-need-for-the-negativity.html/comment-page-1#comment-14127</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 02:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.here.org.uk/?p=1826#comment-14127</guid>
		<description>A fair response.

The comment from Rob Wells about Spotify having a sustainable business model should be questioned though, as Universal have one of the largest equity stakes in the company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fair response.</p>
<p>The comment from Rob Wells about Spotify having a sustainable business model should be questioned though, as Universal have one of the largest equity stakes in the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.here.org.uk/2010/01/no-need-for-the-negativity.html/comment-page-1#comment-14124</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.here.org.uk/?p=1826#comment-14124</guid>
		<description>I agree with Lee. Techcrunch IS full of shit. And like Stephen said; They are always trying to create controversy in a sad attempt to self publicize. The Twitter leak was an example of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Lee. Techcrunch IS full of shit. And like Stephen said; They are always trying to create controversy in a sad attempt to self publicize. The Twitter leak was an example of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fergus</title>
		<link>http://www.here.org.uk/2010/01/no-need-for-the-negativity.html/comment-page-1#comment-14123</link>
		<dc:creator>Fergus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.here.org.uk/?p=1826#comment-14123</guid>
		<description>Man don&#039;t get me started on TechCrunch. They provide some insight in to our industry but the number of times  see TC journo&#039;s with #fail in their tweets or posts just makes you want to shout &quot;go on then do it your f*****n self&quot;.

But entrepreneurship, survival, growth are nowhere near as news worthy as a good failure. If entrepreneurs carried this much negativity nothing would ever happen. But hey at least we don&#039;t have to live with them

Journo&#039;s view on life #fail</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man don&#8217;t get me started on TechCrunch. They provide some insight in to our industry but the number of times  see TC journo&#8217;s with #fail in their tweets or posts just makes you want to shout &#8220;go on then do it your f*****n self&#8221;.</p>
<p>But entrepreneurship, survival, growth are nowhere near as news worthy as a good failure. If entrepreneurs carried this much negativity nothing would ever happen. But hey at least we don&#8217;t have to live with them</p>
<p>Journo&#8217;s view on life #fail</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.here.org.uk/2010/01/no-need-for-the-negativity.html/comment-page-1#comment-14122</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.here.org.uk/?p=1826#comment-14122</guid>
		<description>Had to chuckle at the bit about Spotify being better off in Zuckerberg&#039;s hands. How profitable is Facebook??

Techcrunch is just another site that tries to create controversy to drive traffic. Safely ignore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had to chuckle at the bit about Spotify being better off in Zuckerberg&#8217;s hands. How profitable is Facebook??</p>
<p>Techcrunch is just another site that tries to create controversy to drive traffic. Safely ignore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee McCoy</title>
		<link>http://www.here.org.uk/2010/01/no-need-for-the-negativity.html/comment-page-1#comment-14121</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.here.org.uk/?p=1826#comment-14121</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t read techcrunch out there as its full of shit.&#8221;</p>
<p>should read</p>
<p>&#8220;I don’t read techcrunch anymore as its full of shit.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee McCoy</title>
		<link>http://www.here.org.uk/2010/01/no-need-for-the-negativity.html/comment-page-1#comment-14120</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.here.org.uk/?p=1826#comment-14120</guid>
		<description>Have to agree with you on this one Kieron!

I may prefer last.fm because I can let it run for hours without even realising its on, but you&#039;ve got a point about Techcrunch.

Its my belief that these &quot;correspondents&quot; get paid by page impressions, or ad clicks on their posts and so when it comes to the month and they&#039;re running short of their targets have to write anything that&#039;ll bring in the numbers - regardless of how factual it is.

What you may also like to note is that Techcrunch is an old boys&#039; network. There&#039;s very little openness in that their &quot;journalists&quot; have a tendency, I believe, to support certain projects without declaring their involvement or if inducement was given.

I don&#039;t read techcrunch out there as its full of shit. There&#039;s plenty more fantastic stuff out there to spend my spare time reading. If I want to read made up crap I&#039;ll read the Onion - at least its obvious its nonsensical.

Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to agree with you on this one Kieron!</p>
<p>I may prefer last.fm because I can let it run for hours without even realising its on, but you&#8217;ve got a point about Techcrunch.</p>
<p>Its my belief that these &#8220;correspondents&#8221; get paid by page impressions, or ad clicks on their posts and so when it comes to the month and they&#8217;re running short of their targets have to write anything that&#8217;ll bring in the numbers &#8211; regardless of how factual it is.</p>
<p>What you may also like to note is that Techcrunch is an old boys&#8217; network. There&#8217;s very little openness in that their &#8220;journalists&#8221; have a tendency, I believe, to support certain projects without declaring their involvement or if inducement was given.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t read techcrunch out there as its full of shit. There&#8217;s plenty more fantastic stuff out there to spend my spare time reading. If I want to read made up crap I&#8217;ll read the Onion &#8211; at least its obvious its nonsensical.</p>
<p>Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

